Updates…

I’ve fallen a bit behind lately on updating this blog – I’ve posted very infrequently over the past few months, and just realised I haven’t posted a book review since August! I’ve certainly read some good books since then though, so will try to get a few reviews up shortly.

I have been reviewing elsewhere though! In September/October I read all six of the shortlisted Booker Prize novels, and posted my reviews as a guest of the lovely Leeds Book Club. Here’s the links to my reviews:

I’ve got some great books to read stocked up – including this one that I am particularly excited about:

Black Vodka, by Deborah Levy

Black Vodka, by Deborah Levy

I signed up as a subscriber to ace indie publisher & Other Stories after reading Swimming Home, and this is the first of my subscribers’ books they’ve sent me! Hugely exciting to get this in the post today – especially opening it and seeing my name listed among the subscribers at the back :)

My name in the subscriber list!

And they even sent some lovely postcards, featuring a poem by Deborah Levy, along with it:

Poetry postcard

I was absolutely blown away by Swimming Home, so I can’t wait to read more of Levy’s work. This is probably going to have to wait to January to be read though, but watch out for a review in the new year!

It’s going to have to wait until January because I am desperately trying to complete my Mount TBR Challenge for the year! To recap, I pledged to read 40 of the books from my TBR list by the end of the year. I’m currently at 29 – not bad, but a way still to go! Can I read 11 books in the next 3 and a half weeks?? We shall see…

Why I am spoiling my ballot in the Police Commissioner elections

Quick lunchtime blog post, just to explain in more detail some things I’m struggling to get across in 140 characters on Twitter!

I am spoiling my ballot in today’s Police and Crime Commissioner elections for the following reasons:

  • I disagree with the whole idea of an elected police commissioner*, as I do not believe that policing should be politicised
  • I have almost no idea of who is standing, what they stand for, and indeed what the post will entail, due to the shocking lack of publicity and education around this election
  • The four candidates standing in my area (one LibDem, one Labour, one Tory, on independent) all make generic statements about reducing crime, with almost nothing to differentiate them from each other, so I genuinely don’t know who I would vote for anyway
  • Even if any of the candidates stood out at all, I still wouldn’t know who to vote for, as I am an ordinary member of the public with no experience of policing and no idea what policies would be successful. Why not leave this up to people who know what they’re doing?

I certainly agree that more transparency and more accountability would be a good thing for the police, but I strongly disagree that this is the way to go about it. I am choosing to spoil my ballot rather than just not vote because I do want my voice to be heard. Turnout is predicted to be incredibly low for this election, but I suspect this will be put down to lack of information and/or voter apathy, rather than people actively choosing not to vote. Spoiled ballots are counted, and if enough people do this then it will send a message to the government that the public do not want elected police and crime commissioners.

The only circumstance in which I would be voting today is if I felt strongly about keeping out any of the candidates in my area: for example if there was a representative from a far-right party, or any obvious “hang ‘em and flog ‘em” types standing. That isn’t the case for West Yorkshire (as far as I can tell), so a spoiled ballot it is.

Obviously this is  a matter for individual choice, but if anyone else is not planning on voting for any of the reasons I’ve listed above, or any other reasons, then I would urge you to make your voice heard with a spoiled ballot instead.

*Unless, of course, I can vote for Commissioner Gordon. Or, failing that, Sam Vimes.

 

POSTSCRIPT: Just been alerted on Twitter (thanks @ijclark!) to this blog post, explaining in a much clearer way than I have why spoiling your ballot is a good idea (assuming no right-wing shield-munchers are standing in your area)

Sunrise Walk

Team Mandio at the finish!I did it! On Saturday I hauled myself out of bed at 4.30am (a good five hours before I’d normally be awake on a Saturday!) and made my way to Cheltenham Racecourse to take part in the Winston’s Wish Sunrise Walk in memory of my big sister Mandi, alongside my partner Chris, my Dad, and some of Mandi’s good friends.

It was a beautiful day – both in terms of the weather and the atmosphere. It was more emotional than I’d expected, but in a good way. I found the whole thing really therapeutic. I’ve spent so long feeling hopeless since Mandi died, it was good to feel like I was doing something concrete and positive, both to honour her memory and to help provide some practical support to her boys, and many other children dealing with similar losses.

I’m thrilled to have raised a massive £910 for Winston’s Wish, and want to offer my heartfelt thanks to everyone who sponsored me. If there’s anyone else out there who wanted to sponsor me but hadn’t got around to it yet, my JustGiving page is still open.

The Sunrise Walk was such a special event to be part of: I’d highly recommend it for anyone who’s experienced this kind of loss. I’m already considering doing it again next year!

Sunrise

See the rest of my photos from the day on Flickr

Feeling lucky

Content note: This rather long, meandering post was inspired by a Twitter conversation. It should not, however, be taken as advice to anyone who was part of that conversation, or indeed to anyone at all. I recognise that there is a big difference between grief and depression or other mental illnesses: I am discussing the former, and have little experience of the latter, so am absolutely not qualified to give advice on it! All I am aiming for with this post is an explanation of my own mental state, thought processes and coping mechanisms. If this turns out useful to someone dealing with similar circumstances, then that’s wonderful. If not, and everyone who reads this thinks my experience is totally inapplicable to anyone else, I will not be hurt.

A couple of mornings ago, @twistedwillow tweeted:

  My reply:

 

I was worried that it sounded a bit twee to put it like that, but unfortunately Twitter doesn’t lend itself well to lengthy discusses of mental and emotional states! That’s partly why I wanted to write this post, to give a bit of background and explain a bit more about what I mean.

First, the background. People who know me on Twitter or IRL, and regular readers of this blog, will know that my family has been through a very difficult couple of years. In July 2010, my Mum was diagnosed with cancer of the oesophagus; in August, she was told it was inoperable. Eight months later, in April 2011, she died. A year and a month after that, in May 2012, my apparently healthy eldest sister Mandi died, suddenly and unexpectedly, from a heart attack.

Given that we were still picking up the pieces from having lost Mum a year earlier, Mandi’s death completely devastated us all. We all coped in our various ways: I can’t comment on how my sisters, brother-in-law, Dad, and Mandi’s kids have coped since, that isn’t my story to tell, but I did want to say a bit here about how I experienced the grief.

Losing Mum was heartbreaking. Losing Mandi was both heartbreaking and bewildering. How could this amazing, vital person, whom I’d spoken to just two days before, suddenly be gone? I don’t have a very clear memory of the first few weeks after her death: I do remember telling a friend who’d asked how I was that I knew from what we’d been through with Mum that that part was the easy bit. The early days after someone dies are a whirlwind: there’s so much to do, and so many new feelings to come to terms with, that it actually protects you from the truth of it. The hard part starts when real life starts again, and you discover that while your world has changed forever, everyone else’s hasn’t. At least, that has been my experience of it.

I went back home and back to work two and a half weeks after Mandi died, and spent the next few months just wading through despair. And despair is really the only word I can find for it: that feeling that there is nothing good in the world, nothing good on the horizon, and no way out of how you’re currently feeling. I slept fitfully at nights, troubled by vague, disturbing dreams, regularly sleepwalking, sleeptalking, and waking up in a panic feeling like I couldn’t breathe. I think I managed to hold things together at work, though looking back I’m not sure how I made that effort: it was a struggle to get out of bed every morning, weekday or weekend, because I just didn’t see the point in anything.

I am lucky enough never to have experienced chronic depression, so apologies to anyone who has if I’m about to say something inappropriate, but I’d imagine that what I went through was a lot like depression. The main difference, I suppose, is that I knew that the way I was feeling was a temporary reaction to a specific event. I also knew it would pass, or at least get easier with time, as I’d been through a very similar time after Mum had died.

Throughout those months, I was trying – and failing – to remember what Mum always taught us: to count our blessings. Problem was, I couldn’t see them as blessings. Yes, I was gifted with a wonderful family: but I’d now seen two of them die, and who knew who was going to be next?

The main difference between what I went through after Mum died and after Mandi died was in my fears. When Mum died, I had regular nightmares in which horrible things happened to people who I loved. Night after night, I watched each of my loved ones die, and was powerless to help them. However, I don’t think I was ever really scared of that actually happening. Yes, the dreams were awful, but we dream in metaphor: I think what I was really scared of was losing my family, losing what made them so special. The whole family dynamic changed after Mum died – it’s not necessarily worse now, just different – and it took a while for us all to work out what our family looked like. I think those dreams were just a reflection of that worry and uncertainty.

After Mandi died though, that was turned on its head. Suddenly I knew that anyone could be ripped away from me at any time, without reason or warning. Objectively of course I’d always known that was possible, as we all do, but nobody ever actually expects it to happen. I certainly didn’t. Knowing that something is possible is rather different to being presented with it as fact. I’ve written previously about my overwhelming fear that more terrible things were about to happen, so I won’t dwell on it here, just to note that that was my state of mind for several months.

I feel like I’m out of the other side of that now, hence I feel able to write this post. I know from past experience that things can and probably will get worse again, that I may well be dumped right back into that pit of despair without warning, but that the amount of time I spend in the pit each visit will gradually lessen. Nevertheless, right now I feel good. I feel like myself again. Most importantly, I feel lucky.

Because that’s what (eventually) this post is really about. Via an unneccessarily meandering path, I have arrived at last at the point I wanted to make in response to @twistedwillow’s tweets. Despite everything, I feel lucky. Scratch that, I am lucky.

Why am I lucky? Well, just look at what I’ve got. I have a wonderful Dad who loves me. I still have two sisters who are my best friends. I have a brother-in-law who I actually only refer to as an in-law here for clarity: generally I just call him my brother. He’s as close and as dear to me as any brother-by-blood could be. I have a partner who loves and supports me, and has been my rock through this entire ordeal. I have a brand new nephew who has just learned to smile. I have another brother-in-law and a potential future brother-in-law who are just wonderful, and make my sisters so happy. And I have two gorgeous, hilarious nephews who have inherited their mother’s warmth and sense of fun, and keep me endlessly entertained with silly jokes and surprisingly deep questions (sample from Spike, 5: “Does Freddie know he’s a baby?” *mind boggles* Sample from Finn, 3: “Why did the chicken cross the road? He needed a poo!!” *falls over laughing*).

That’s what I meant by focusing on what you have, and that’s what my mum meant when she taught us to count our blessings. What I’m trying to do now, and mostly succeeding at, is thinking about how much I have that most people never had. That doesn’t mean that I’m not allowed to be sad, and it doesn’t mean beating myself up for complaining that my diamond shoes are too tight (because sometimes they’re just diamante, and they really can pinch). All it is is a mental trick for when I feel myself heading back into the pit again.

I cannot stress how important it is to feel lucky, and not just for my own mental health. My second eldest sister, Katie (mother of Freddie), said something incredibly wise and insightful, as she has a habit of doing, in the first days after Mandi died. She pointed out how easy it would have been, after Mum died, for each of us to have just withdrawn into ourselves, forgetting about the wonderful family we still had and just wallowing in misery over the one we’d lost, and not taking the time to enjoy being with each other, as family. We could have done that, and we would have wasted what turned out to be our final year with Mandi. So we have to focus on what’s here, not on what’s gone, because the consequences of not doing so are too great.

One final point. Shortly after I tweeted my thoughts to @twistedwillow, I saw this tweet from her:

I don’t know if that was in response to my tweet or not, but it seems relevant, so I am going to address it here.

I said above that I feel lucky for everything that I have. I do, but I also feel lucky for what I’ve lost. I’ve lost an incredible mum, who was wise, and patient, and kind, and loving. I’ve lost a big sister who was like a second mum to me, who was generous, and giving, and had a wicked sense of humour and a massive, mad laugh that you could hear from streets away. And I’m not the only one who’s lost them: for both of their funerals/memorials, it was standing room only.

Yes, I’ve lost them. But I had them to begin with. I had these wonderful, magical people in my life. How many people were never that lucky? How many people never had a Mum like my mum? How many people never had a Mandi?

I still fear losing other loved ones, although it is not so all-encompassing as it was for a while. I might suggest that I am more conscious than most that it is a possibility. But while focusing on how much I love them does make me fear losing them, I can remind myself that if I do lose them, at least I was lucky enough to have them in my life to begin with.

So yes. I am lucky. I forgot that for a while, but I’ve got it back now and I will not let go of it easily.

Book review: 253, Geoff Ryman

Continuing with my Mount TBR challenge (which is still ongoing, although I may have fallen off the wagon recently with regards to buying new books…), I just finished reading 253, by Geoff Ryman. I got this from readitswapit.co.uk about a year ago, after seeing it mentioned favourably by Neil Gaiman. I had no idea what it was about, but I trust Mr Gaiman’s taste so I thought I’d go for it.

253 is an odd book. From the blurb:

A Bakerloo line tube train with no one standing and no empty seats carries 252 passengers. The driver makes 253. They all have their own secret histories, their own thoughts about themselves and their travelling neighbours. And they all have one page, totalling exactly 253 words, devoted to them. Each page a story, each page a novel. There are connections and rejections, chance meetings and frantic avoidance, bitter memories and sweet anticipation…

It’s a seven-and-a-half minute journey between Embankment and the Elephant & Castle. It’s the journey of 253 lifetimes.

I hadn’t realised when I got this book that it actually started life as an online “interactive novel” – which is still live (and charmingly retro in its sparse, HTML-only design!). The book was published in 1998, so the website was presumably around shortly before that. In a lot of ways it really feels like a project of the late 90s, the early days of the web, when people were still wondering what to do with it all. The “interactive” nature of the online novel is basically that the whole thing is hyperlinked, so if passenger 163 mentions something to do with passenger 215, you can click through to see what passenger 215 was doing/thinking about. It’s an interesting way to explore the story, but I’m not sure I’d spend much time on it.

The book itself is a surprisingly gripping read. The one-page-per-character approach means that it’s perfect for dipping in and out of (on train journeys, for example!), and is varied enough to hold your interest. Some of the “stories” are stronger than others, but all are of a high standard – and the good ones are very good indeed. If you’re at all interested in reading or writing flash fiction I would certainly recommend this book – it’s a masterclass in how to construct a story in very few words.

I’ve mentioned the story a couple of times, but of course this isn’t a narrative as such. Nevertheless, there is a kind of story weaving through it: some of the passengers may know each other, or have run into each other previously without remembering them, and by reading through each of their pages in turn a wider picture reveals itself. For example, one passenger is telling her neighbour, a colleague, about a conversation she overheard on the phone involving two women apparently plotting a murder. Her neighbour is trying to comfort her, but on her page we find out that she knows that the call was staged as a practical joke. In the next carriage is the two womens’ boss, who was in on the joke, but is planning to use it as a way of framing someone else for his planned murder of his wife. A few carriages on is another man who works with them, who has noticed the boss acting odd, and plans to follow him home to see what he’s up to.

That’s the most extreme example I can think of, but the book is full of little micro-stories, some exciting and some mundane. There is also a larger, over-arching storyline that frames the whole thing, but as this is only first mentioned halfway through and only fully revealed at the end, I won’t give it away here!

The way the people on the train interact with each other (or don’t), record their reactions to and judgments of other characters, and react to things that happen on the train (some impromptu street theatre in one carriage, a vomiting drunk in another) all felt true to life. Although some of the references to London are understandably dated, anyone who has spent any time on the Tube will find much here that is familiar. I really enjoyed 253 for the slice-of-life feel it had, and although there were some stories I left dying to know what happened next, ultimately it was all very satisfying.

An interesting experimental book, that I would recommend to anyone interested in micro-fiction, or just looking for something to read in quick breaks.

Verdict: 3/5

Book review: Come the Fear, Chris Nickson

Come the Fear is the fourth book in Chris Nickson’s Richard Nottingham series of historical crime novels (previous books reviewed here). From the blurb:

March, 1733. Richard Nottingham, Constable of the City of Leeds, joins others trying desperately to put out a fire in an empty house before it destroys the entire street. The next morning, searching the blackened ruins, he finds the charred corpse of a girl, something placed on her chest. Had the fire been started to conceal her murder?

Starting with just a single clue, Nottingham his deputy John Sedgwick and Rob Lister slowly piece together the girl’s past, a journey that takes them into the camps of the homeless, the homes of rich merchants, down and the poor and those beyond hope, deep into the dark secrets and lies that families keep hidden.

This book takes a darker turn than the previous one, The Constant Lovers. It’s similar in tone and pace to the second book, Cold Cruel Winter – which was my favourite up until now! I absolutely loved this book. In my opinion, it’s the strongest of the series so far.

Warning: review contains spoilers for the previous books in the series.

The central mystery of the book – who was the girl in the fire, why was she killed, and why did the killer mutilate her in the way he did – is gripping in itself, with enough wrong turns and red herrings to keep me guessing up until the (horrifying) conclusion. But as with Chris Nickson’s earlier books, the murder isn’t really the point. The murder provides a framework for the interplay of the main and supporting characters – and it is in this area that the book really shines.

Family is a strong theme running throughout the book: the distraught family of the murdered girl; Richard Nottingham’s concerns over his daughter Emily’s happiness; deputy constable John Sedgwick’s running battles with his 5-year-old son who is running wild and jealous of his new baby sister; and new Constable’s man Rob Lister’s conflict with his father over his burgeoning romance with Emily. Add in a child-snatcher targeting children in Leeds and all of the Constable’s men’s fears for their families in the often precarious world they live in really come to the surface.

Speaking of Emily, I was thrilled to see her story given such prominence in this book. She is one of my favourite characters, and I very much enjoyed getting to see her asserting her independence once again! Although her attitude towards courtship and marriage is probably not typical for a young lady of this time period, it didn’t feel anachronistic. I understand there is another book planned for this series, so I’m looking forward to seeing if this causes any more conflict.

One thing that surprised me about this book was that there was so little mention of Amos Worthy, the pimp with an unexpected connection to Richard Nottingham whose (spoiler!) death at the end of the previous book looked set to tip the city into chaos as rival pimps and gangs fought to assert their dominance over areas Worthy had previously ruled with an iron fist. It’s mentioned near the start that the Constable is starting to see a bit of trouble from this direction, but nothing really comes up for the rest of the book. It’s understandable that this wasn’t brought up again, as frankly Nottingham seemed to have his hands full enough for the rest of the time, but it did surprise me a little.

As I said, this is certainly my favourite of the series so far. Tense, gripping, well-plotted and ultimately satisfying – and with a genuinely shocking ending that made me gasp out loud, earning me some very funny looks on the train! Can’t wait for the next one :)

Verdict: 4/5

—Exciting News—

The launch of Come the Fear will take place on 14 September at Arts@Trinity, and promises to be an exciting night! Sadly I can’t make it, as I’ll be in Cheltenham getting ready for the Winston’s Wish Sunrise Walk, but it sounds like a fab evening so, if you’re at all interested in Chris’ books, or Leeds, or crime fiction, or meeting awesome people and having a fab time, get on down there!

Book review: In Other Worlds: SF and the Human Imagination, Margaret Atwood

In Other Worlds is a collection of Margaret Atwood’s writings on and around the subject of science fiction, focusing particularly on dystopias. As I am a huge fan of both sci fi and Margaret Atwood, I couldn’t resist this book!

Atwood has of course written a few dystopian sci fi novels herself – The Handmaid’s Tale, Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood, although she prefers the term “speculative fiction” to describe these. Her apparent rejection of the sci fi label has caused a bit of controversy in the past, as it was construed as literary snobbishness, and she addresses this in the introduction to In Other Worlds. Her explanation of the disparate forms of fiction that are grouped together under the umbrella term of science fiction, and her preference for using more specific terms to describe sub-genres, such as speculative fiction, dispelled (for me, at least) any suggestion that she has any disdain for sci fi as a genre.

What comes across most clearly in this book is her genuine love for the genre, in all its forms. In the first section, Atwood outlines her early experiences with sci fi and fantasy – covering everything from superhero comics and the lurid tales of bug-eyed monsters in sci fi magazines, to the tales of HG Wells and Ray Bradbury, to classics like Pilgrim’s Process and Beowulf. She describes herself as an indiscriminate reader, devouring in her early years everything she could get her hands on, with a healthy disregard for the adult distinctions of high- middle- and low-brow. Her breadth of knowledge is evident: she discusses Batman in the same breath as Shakespeare, and treats all of her subjects with the same level of respect due to any good story.

She goes on to discuss her experiences at university, studying literature with a focus on utopian and dystopian writing. This section is fascinating: Atwood discusses the motivations and psychology behind these types of writing, highlighting some more and less familiar examples of each – it gave me some inspiration for suggestions for Leeds Book Club‘s new dystopia book club! If you’re a fan of Margaret Atwood’s books, this section by itself is worth the price of the book for the insight it gives to the influences and inspiration for her novels.

The middle part of the book is a series of previously published essays on individual sci fi titles, including 1984, Brave New World, Never Let Me Go, The Island of Doctor Moreau, Gulliver’s Travels – some written as reviews, some as introductions to the books, etc. I found these essays equally illuminating for the books I’d actually read as for those I hadn’t – and the latter lead to quite a few additions to my to-read list! My only small criticism of the book come from this section – as these are all previously published, there is some repetition of ideas and themes, including some that had already been discussed in greater detail in the first section. This is to be expected really, but it did mean that it started to feel a bit familiar by the time I got to the end of this section.

The final section contains a series of Atwood’s own examples of sci fi writing – short stories, and extracts from some of her non-sci fi books (e.g. one of the stories told by the male protagonist in The Blind Assassin, “The Peach Women of A’Aa”, is included). Coming at the end of the book, these are fascinating to read as examples of how Atwood has used her extensive knowledge of sci fi to inform her own writing.

In Other Worlds is a thoughtful, intelligent exploration of the science fiction genre, from a writer who has extensive knowledge and a genuine love of her topic. Highly recommended for either fans of Margaret Atwood, science fiction, or both.

Verdict: 4.5/5

Book review: The Constant Lovers, Chris Nickson

The third in Chris Nickson’s Richard Nottingham series of crime novels set in 18th century Leeds (see my previous reviews), The Constant Lovers has both a different setting and a much slower pace than the previous two books. From the blurb:

On a hot summer morning, Richard Nottingham, Constable of Leeds, is called out when a young woman is found stabbed to death among the ruins of Kirkstall Abbey, just outside the city. In her pocket is a carefully-folded love note: “Soon we’ll be together and our hearts can sing loud, my love, W.” Her pale skin and smooth hands speak of money, but no one comes to claim her body.

When the victim’s husband eventually appears, his evidence throws up more questions than answers. What happened to the maid who accompanied her mistress on her final, fatal journey? Who is the mysterious ‘W’ who signed the note? And why does the victim’s father seem so indifferent to her death? Nottingham has to delve into the dark secrets of the rich and influential to uncover the truth.

The Constant Lovers is very different in tone to the previous two books. While both The Broken Token and Cold Cruel Winter dealt with the often poverty-stricken dwellers of the city, a world that Richard Nottingham knew well and could navigate with ease, this book takes us outside of the city and into the world of the wealthy, landowning country gentlemen. Nottingham is well out of his depth in this world, and knows it, which made for an interesting change. It was fascinating seeing this capable character out of his comfort zone.

This book also saw the introduction of a new character: Rob Lister, the son of the local newspaper publisher, who joins as one of the Constable’s men (replacing Joshua Forester, who left at the end of the last book). Not exactly wealthy, but well-to-do and of a higher social class than the Constable’s deputy John Sedgwick, Rob’s introduction gives the reader the opportunity to see the poverty of city life through his outsider’s perspective. He also serves as a kind of bridge between the commoners that Nottingham and Sedgwick are most used to dealing with, and the gentry that they find themselves having to confront in the course of the book.

I did find this book a little harder to get into than the previous two. As mentioned, it has a much slower pace – especially compared to Cold Cruel Winter, which zipped along. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but I did find it less gripping. Once I had got into it though, I really enjoyed the new perspective that this book is told from. It gave the historical Leeds that Chris Nickson evokes a fuller, rounder feeling.

Once again, I really enjoyed the sub-plots involving the interplay and relationships between all the supporting characters. Sedgwick’s slight insecurity following Lister’s arrival is very well played, as is the plotline involving his partner Lizzie, who is expecting a new child. I was also pleased to see that Nottingham’s daughter Emily seemed to have got a bit of her independence back in this book: I said in my review of Cold Cruel Winter that she seemed to have been pushed into the background somewhat, “cured” of her earlier, rebellious ways and recast as the dutiful, docile daughter. It was good to see her brought to the forefront again – I’d love to see a bit more of her in the next book!

A slower, more thoughtful, introspective read than the previous books in the series, this is an excellent read for any fans of historical crime fiction.

Verdict: 3.5/5

Book review: The Song of Achilles, Madeline Miller

Song of Achilles book cover“Sing to me, Muse, of the wrath of Achilles, son of Peleus, which brought countless ills upon the Acheans”

I picked up The Song of Achilles as part of my birthday haul, as I’d seen a few reviews of it and it looked wonderful. From the blurb:

Greece in the age of Heroes. Patroclus, an awkward young prince, has been exiled to the kingdom of Phthia. Here he is nobody, just another unwanted boy living in the shadow of King Peleus and his golden son, Achilles. Achilles, ‘best of all the Greeks’, is everything Patroclus is not – strong, beautiful, the child of a goddess – and by all rights their paths should never cross. Yet one day, Achilles takes the shamed prince under his wing and soon their tentative companionship gives way to a steadfast friendship. As they grow into young men skilled in the arts of war and medicine, their bond blossoms into something far deeper – despite the displeasure of Achilles’s mother Thetis, a cruel and deathly pale sea goddess with a hatred of mortals. Fate is never far from the heels of Achilles. When word comes that Helen of Sparta has been kidnapped, the men of Greece are called upon to lay siege to Troy in her name. Seduced by the promise of a glorious destiny, Achilles joins their cause. Torn between love and fear for his friend, Patroclus follows Achilles into war, little knowing that the years that follow will test everything they have learned, everything they hold dear. And that, before he is ready, he will be forced to surrender his friend to the hands of Fate. Profoundly moving and breathtakingly original, this rendering of the epic Trojan War is a dazzling feat of the imagination, a devastating love story, and an almighty battle between gods and kings, peace and glory, immortal fame and the human heart.

I’ve always been fascinated by the stories of Ancient Greece, so this looked right up my street! I was not disappointed. Madeline Miller obviously knows the source material incredibly well: she has studied and taught both ancient Greek and Latin, and has past experience of adapting classical tales for a modern audience for the theatre, although this is her first novel. Her background, and her obvious knowledge of and love for the stories and characters of ancient Greece shines through the book. I have read the Iliad (although it was some years ago), and I was impressed by Miller’s mastery of the language, the lyricism and storytelling style of Homer’s epic. Her portrayal of the characters was also spot on: although she puts her own spin on them, they are recognisably the same people (and gods, etc!) that populate the Iliad.

Song of Achilles is first and foremost a love story, and a beautiful, heartbreaking one at that. I read a rather sniffy review in the Telegraph, which described it as “not a bodice-ripping, so let’s call it a breastplate-ripping romp… like homoerotic slash fiction”. This is deeply unfair, and made me wonder whether the reviewer had actually read the book. Yes, it’s a love story between two men; and yes, it is very sensual. It’s not explicit in any way though: the few sex scenes are actually very coyly described, which I thought was in keeping with Patroclus’ personality. To dismiss it as slash fiction completely misses the point.

One of the things I loved most about this book – and that gave me that odd sensation of wanting to keep reading because I couldn’t put it down, but at the same time not really wanting to reach the end – is the sense of crushing inevitability about it. If you know the story then you know it doesn’t end well for these two – but Patroclus as narrator is of course unaware of what lies ahead. It’s a wonderfully effective use of dramatic irony, and added another layer of gut wrenching pathos to the whole book.

I think this is one of my favourite books of the year so far. It was one of those reads that made me feel slightly resentful of any time spent doing other things than reading it. Just wonderful.

Verdict: 4.5/5

Good news!

I have a brand new nephew! Please welcome to the world Freddie Evan David Jones, born 14 July 2012 at 9.34 am, weighing 9lb 11oz:

Freddie

He was 16 days overdue, but well worth the wait! I think he’s just inherited his mother’s sense of drama, and wanted to make a good entrance…

Isn’t he beautiful?! I mean, obviously I’m biased, but… seriously, isn’t he beautiful! Sadly I’ve now got to wait a week until I can get down to London and meet him in person. I shall be storing up all of my best Auntie cuddles until then :)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,250 other followers